

Spartak Moskva 1-1 Celtic: Immediate Reaction
By: JT | August 15th, 2007
Supporters don’t know shit. That’s the morale of the story after Celtic collected a huge 1-1 draw with Spartak Moskva in the first leg of their Champions League third round qualifier.
The gasp in the pub was audible when we saw Scott McDonald up front, Paul Hartley in the left of midfield, and Aiden McGeady on the bench. We looked at each other, laughed, and cursed Wee Gordon Strachan and his kin.
So guess who created the goal that could earn Celtic millions? It was McDonald himself, who floated a ball across Spartak’s box right onto the head of Hartley who dispatched the ball perfectly into the side netting.
Spartak’s goal was poorly defended by Celtic and Mark Brown should really have made the save. The central defenders drifted too close to the action, stranding Scott Brown behind the play with two Spartak players surrounding him. Roman Pavluchenko, who is about six inches taller than Scott Brown won the cross and headed toward goal. Mark Brown should have deflected the ball away from danger, but his failure to perform the adequate number of wrist curls in the offseason allowed the ball to get by him and slowly roll into the net.
Mark Brown redeemed himself with a superb leg save in the second half, and Spartak also hit the crossbar, but Brown had it well covered. Why is it that people act like hitting the crossbar is “almost a goal”? Most of the time the keepers have it under control.
After McGeady came on late, Celtic had the chance to wrap up the match and maybe the tie, when he sent a surgical ball through the Spartak defense and Scott Brown turned what should have been a first time ball into the net into a calamity. Scottie Bhoy will be ruing his inability to convert from such close range.
In the end, Celtic played an outstanding match. They were content to counter-attack, and soak up the pressure that Spartak brought. They created three or four excellent chances in only a couple of opportunities and that was it. Spartak, despite statisitcs that appear to show their dominance, really didn’t create anything that Celtic didn’t hand them on a silver platter. The Bhoys should feel extremely confident heading back to Glasgow against a team that they are better than.
WGS also has an interesting plan for this midfield. They switch positions constantly. I’m not sure if its to get a defense who is man marking Nakamura out of postion or what, but they’re doing it well. Massimo Donati was Egor Titov’s shadow, and Hartley, Brown, and Naka were always popping up at different spots on the pitch. Spartak seemed to have trouble locating them as well.
I’m looking forward to the second leg, it should be fantastic. The Hoops have put themselves in pole position to move on the the group stages. The need to show that killer instinct in two weeks time and shut this tie down early.
*****UPDATE:The Highlights. Feel Scott Brown’s pain.*****
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Good job to Celtic. They did what they had to, got the away goal, and should handle this tie well back in Glasgow. Nakamura had one of the worst games I’ve seen from him in a while … he just didn’t seem on his game at all. Poor passes, really anonymous play, but the team got through what could have been a very dangerous match, and that goal might be worth millions of pounds.
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



I didn’t get a chance to watch this one. How did the fake turf play?
Posted from
United States

-



Bob, the turf really didnt’t seem to make much of a difference to Celtic. There was a brief adjustment period at the begining of the match and some absurdly high hops, but overall nothing that made you think they were having issues. I did sense a bit of a reluctance to tackle on their part though.
Nothing bad from the refs either save an insane yellow handed to Lee Naylor when the Spartak punk clearly took a dive.
Ian, Naka’s tired. He needs a break, and I’m betting we don’t see him again until the return leg against Spartak. That was probably his deal with WGS when he got back from the Asian Cup.
Posted from
United States

-



i thought naka did well he is a fit bloke and doesn’t need a rest.
the pitch made the game a bit of a lottery..no tackles being made a bit pre-seasonish..
great report mate..
hail hail
Posted from
United States

-



Sometimes I’ve been asked by one man or another,
Why do I follow Celtic, why do I take the bother,
But he must be a fool, who would ask me such a question,
So then how can I explain, try to tell him what he’s missing,
And it’s 1, 2, 3, Celtic for me,
Not a team in the world like the Celtic.Go Bhoys!
JT, thanks for the posts. I’m off of vacation now; and trying to catch up on work, so I don’t have the time to stop by quite as often. But I’m glad for your comments when I get here.
Posted from
United States

-



Guys from mountains, Spartak really looked better and even played better then your proud Celtic. During all the match, Celtic managed to create only two moments (as a result you scored one) in comparison with Spartak Moscow having smashed your defensive lines. Good job for Sparak.
Your funny “jap-naka” team will be ruined in Glasgow.
Good luck)Posted from
Russian Federation

-



Hard luck PTW because it’s the result that matters and playing away in Russia is a bit different than playing at home in Celtic Park. I don’t want to jinx it but I reckon Spartak will crumble under the pressure.
Posted from
Ireland

-



PTW … good to hear the Russian fans can talk trash as well as anywhere else. No matter the two sides, a score draw at home in this sort of tie is a bad result. Celtic are winning the tie on away goals as we speak, and have a great record at home. I’m not saying its out of reach for Spartak - you’re right, your side made more scoring opportunities - but Spartak NEEDS to score, and Celtic doesn’t.
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



PTW,
Let me echo Liam: It’s the results that matter! Sure, there’s a second leg; but it’ll be played at Paradise on REAL turf.
Nothing’s out of reach for Spartak, but they’d better grow some long arms to snatch this one away from the Bhoys.
Posted from
United States

-



Also, I can’t possibly believe that Celtic fans would have posted the same reaction if the Hoops had drawn 1-1 at home in the first leg.
Celtic fans would have held out hope for the road trip; but they’d have been lamenting those blown scoring opportunities, rather than point to them as a good sign.
I’m glad that some people can raise their morale simply based on missed opportunities. I think that Celtic fans - and, more importantly, the Bhoys themselves - demand better.
Posted from
United States

-



PTW, I hear what you’re saying, but Celtic’s game plan, especially once they got the goal, was to defend and counter attack, so their number of chances doesn’t mean much. The fact that they were all excellent chances and converted one of them should be worrying to Spartak.
I didn’t see a very creative team in Spartak at all. The chances I can remember off the top of my head were the direct result of mistakes by a young defense in their third match of the season together. They’ll be much, much better in two weeks time.
For Celtic, five of their eleven were playing in their first high pressure Euro action, and considering all the factors going against them, performed superbly.
Posted from
United States

-



I’m lamenting Brownie’s mental miss… shoulda one-timed that instead of trying to make goalie toast.
Posted from
United States

-



JT,
It was good game. Fairly balanced I would say. It will be difficult to spartak to get to CL qualification on Celtic Park. Pressure will be tremendous on them and playing under lots of noise will be difficult. BTW have you got the tickets for the game?Posted from
India

-



No tickets for me Adam, I’m States based. But it’ll still be great to see on the TV.
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed















